Sunday, October 31, 2010

Fuck The World IS Freedom of Expression Weasel!

Fuck The World IS Freedom of Expression Weasel!

. If I can empower you readers with a combination of practical knowledge, a positive attitude, and a deep respect for freedom of expression, then I will count myself successful

If you have any constructive suggestions to help me do my writing job more effectively.

Deep Respect for freedom of expression? WTF?

The only other site I have seen asking for “constructive” suggestions was a very totalitarian cruel cult. China would probably “ask for constructive suggestions” and all other places under the watchful eye of Amnesty International who don’t take dissent lightly and where it will usually cost you your head literally. If you are willing to make dictatorial false statements you should expect something a little less than constructive since lies have to be DESTRUCTED not constructed. Imposing one’s opinion is not exactly a scientific survey of what is and what not.

Answer: In 2010, the most common meaning of "FTW" is "for the win", an Internet expression of enthusiasiam. (sic)

There is absolutely no proof of that whatsoever except maybe in a brain sustained by a banana instead of a backbone. Where is the survey? Where are the stats? And moreover in what kind of world do YOU hang around? The statement utterly stinks of Newspeak: impose an opinion and make it Big Brother Law.

And it is even more supported by more weasel trite tribe like this.

Years ago, "FTW" used to have a very negative meaning: "f**k the world". This was a term commonly used by social rebels, anarchists and anti-authoritarian types to express frustration with modern society. Gratefully, this antisocial meaning has dramatically faded in use in the 21st century, and people largely use "for the win" as the modern meaning for this acronym now.

I should send a couple of “old” Bikies to his door to explain the statement on their forehead really that would be a Reality Check. And it is spelled FUCK THE WORLD. Any 6 year old can read between and ‘f’ and ‘k’ , no need to be puritan, pharisaic, and hypocrite about it.

While there were nastier meanings in previous years, FTW today commonly stands for "For the Win". It is an expression of enthusiasm. "FTW" is the same as saying "this is the best" or"this item will make a big difference, I recommend using it". Examples would include: "anti-lock braking, ftw!", "spellchecker, ftw!", and "low-carb diets, ftw!"
So basically if a part of this is true it is nothing short of an Orwellian nightmare where a perfectly good expression has been hijacked, emasculated and gang banged by a bunch of prissies wearing rose tinted glasses.

Your little prissy dream world doesn’t exist and never will and it is exactly because of fucktards like you that there IS “antisocial” behaviour in the world.

End of.

For now anyway.

Friday, October 29, 2010

The Short on Leibniz

There is no such thing as a best possible world or even a possible world there is THE world as IT IS.

Now to describe it as IT IS would be IMPOSSIBLE since every story is a distortion.

And we are all half-right and half wrong give or take 49.99% either way.

And since the tree of knowledge of good and evil it is absolutely impossible to completely know which is which. What is wrong to you may be right to me and I may be right to think so and “know” so as well but it won’t stop you of thinking it is wrong even though I know better. J

And everything happens for a reason seems to be so utterly wrong these days there is no “reason” to mad killings and misery and innocent suffering or plain stupid bullying.

“Everything happens for a reason” seems to be defeatist propaganda from tyrants or exhausted peasants.

I am beginning to think that Leibniz was smoking some really potent shit.

I don’t doubt theodicy it is the anthropodicy I am very skeptical about.

Thursday, October 28, 2010



The Sin List is something to let go of... it does nothing but keep you perpetuating the guilt within you that is unjustified. Let it go... (J Carmichael, 2010)

Toutes mes conneries pis l'ambition de l'humanité Ça r'vient au même y'a pas d'coupable y'a pas de honte - André Fortin

All my stupidity/idiocies and Humankind's Ambitions Are ALL the same. There is no guilt and no shame.

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that there is no sin or sin list, no guilt, no shame.

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that there is no hell either and no retribution.

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that there is something Eternal, something called Love.

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that we are eternal and we will grow and grow in love.

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that peace and wisdom will prevail somewhere somehow.

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that Heaven and Paradise and Utopia EXIST!

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that the next life is and is so much better than this one.

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that Order will Prevail over Chaos, Good over Evil, Truth over Lies.

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that mankind one day will see the Light.

HELL I’D LIKE TO BELIEVE that one day There WILL be Perfection.

HELL I CAN’T BELIEVE that this is it and this is all.

HELL I CAN’T BELIEVE that we will be stupid forever until self-annihilation.

HELL I CAN’T BELIEVE that people murder each other every day and every hour.

(and there are many forms of murders trust me)

HELL I CAN’T BELIEVE that man will ever change as things are now.

HELL I CAN’T BELIEVE in a Big Bang or Modern Science or Current Myths.

(What we need is another Big Bang preferably on our Big Head)

HELL I CAN’T BELIEVE most of what I hear and see on this planet.

HELL I BELIEVE that we are “just ordinary bastards, half right, half wrong.” (Howard Jacobson)

HELL I BELIEVE that for now we are lied to every day from the day we are born.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

My little college story

Even when I got lucky I got no luck at all.
In a so-called critical thinking college class once that was no more for a while than a cheap high school English class just because the teacher was way in over her head and too lazy to study a decent curriculum (she had us writing resumes for fucksake). She came up with a great idea to have a debate that would take half the term to prepare. Subjects AND SIDES were distributed randomly and I got lucky enough to get my favourite passionate subject and the SIDE I was on ALSO which was AGAINST: the subject being that Mondo card and a cashless society.

Early in the project my partner quits but I can do this. So we get to the debate and take a preliminary vote and obvioulsy I am already the underdog despite 10 undecided.


80% of the undecided votes on my side and I won the debate hands down.
Unfortunately I touched the Finkler Question as Jacobson now calls it and my teacher was unknowingly one of those ASHamed Jewesses.

Don't get me wrong I am not antisemite at all quite the contrary, I am overly biased toward the apple of God's eye as some call it and kind of wish in vain that they could have their peaceful little corner of earth.

So back to my story, she just didn't like my simile of a cashless society in Nazi Germany and how it would have locked the Jews in their slums. She also was one of the two votes against me. The other team just mumbled and fumbled.

So I was looking forward to quite a nice note on this exhilarating experience and I was totally shattered when she gave me a C- and gave the losers a B+, so deflated and disillusioned in fact enraged with a feeling of injustice and powerlessness that I quit the class there and then and being too late in the semester got an F for the whole course.

To this day I have great disdain for courses and sports that can be so arbitrary, one of my most hated word.
In English and Philosophy and many other classes you could write the very best essay ever, a Pulitzer Prize, Hell a Nobel Prize even and some disgruntled low life teacher miserable as hell can give you an F and justify it in a million way. Hell it's easy, serial murderers justify their evil deeds all the time. Where in Maths and some science you can tell the teacher to go and fuck himself and tough titties because you are fucking right and he is fucking wrong...end of.

It probably changed the course of my life but I had a long history of a good IQ backed up by a retarded EQ that was just waiting for me patiently. :)

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Iron sharpens Iron

Iron sharpens Iron

Pro 27:17 Iron sharpeneth iron; so a man sharpeneth the countenance of his friend.

Pro 27:19 As in water face answereth to face, so the heart of man to man.

We loose control.. because the spirit of that substance is inhabiting us spiritually/emotionally and physically should we therefore not be just as concerned about opening that door to the possession of substances or the energy/spirit within a substance as we would be to a supernatural entity?

Spirit! Substances! Entities! All could very well amount to absolutely nothing but Hot Air.

A Gigantic FART if you will.

We do not lose control since we never had it and control is an illusion but yes even though it is not ours it CAN be given at times as in words can only hurt you if you let them etc. (we don’t lose control but we could loose control, as in release it.)

Let’s pretend for one instant that the current naysayers are right! There is no god, there is no spirit and when you die you are nothing more than dust just like your dog, your cat, and the ant that I just crushed by mistake, the billions of living creatures that die each day often eaten by another living creature. One thing we do not know is if those creatures know of the placebo effect. As a matter of fact we don’t know anything at all ourselves about the placebo effects along with another googol things on microcosms and macrocosms that WE DON’T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT.

So how can we know there is nothing else is beyond me.

In order to KNOW there is nothing else one would have to KNOW all that there is.

But let’s pretend the placebo effect exists and it can exist for good or for bad. Therefore with our weak minds, conscious and subconscious, we give attention to certain things and sometimes it works, something, some strange mysterious “substance” kicks in and either we are healed or die because we didn’t “BELIEVE”. That’s good for pills and some meds alright but when you start giving your attention, your ears, your mind, your heart to all those charlatans you give their words power to come back to haunt you. So my safe approach is "don’t drink the kool-aid", don’t give anyone an opportunity to fuck with your mind because you have no fucking idea how your mind works.

So if you want to imagine things you better sing along with Lennon! His utopia will never happen en masse in a billion years but it’s kinda nice on the individual level.

Imagine there's no Heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world

You may say that I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

Nice words even if according to Chapman they come from a hypocrite and a phony!

Try imagining Oprah with no possessions! OUHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Friday, October 22, 2010

W.M.D. WORDS of Mass Destruction

The tongue has the power of life and death. ~ Proverbs 18:21~

I’ve never found an interesting person with a foul mouth.


If the smartest person in the world doesn't hang around people who swear, that tells you something right there!

Whether you like it or not, some words are acceptable and some are not.

The main problem are the people who think using curse words are "okay."

Yuck! Yuck! Pwah! Pwah! Gag! Retch! Vomit!

The Main PROBLEM IS ASSHOLE that there are too many holy inquisition pricks like you in the world.

Many Religious people are so damn ugly and revolting. Hateful Killers at heart.

Lording over you as if they were God themselves using false logic and fallacies to promote the “truth”.

Self centred and self righteous holier than thou hypocrites with a huge stick up their asses. Outraged in holy wrath waiting for their sins to be discovered and exposed to the light.

Come Last Judgment Quick! These pricks are in for a huge FUCKING SURPRISE!

Whether you like it or not ASSHOLE We still LIVE IN A FREE WORLD NO THANKS to dangerous fucktards like you.

I stand with Margaret Cho on this one. God if he/she is or not in all his/her wisdom and glory will certainly know much better than a few hypocritical pricks who are so fucking concerned with the OUTSIDE of their cup. They will be the first to burn in hell if there is such a thing.

And Marilyn not so Savant just ought to get out a little more and have a QUITE INTERESTING CONVO with Stephen Fry!

Speaking of I was watching this movie last night where the bishop Cyril KILLED Hypatia. He did! Not with his bare hands but like Charles Manson with his WORDS! And he was made a saint! He had the power to CHOOSE and he CHOSE!

One Sermon brings LIFE the other BRINGS DEATH!

He could have chosen:

Deu 32:35 To me belongeth vengeance, and recompence; their foot shall slide in due time: for the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things that shall come upon them make haste.

BUT NOOOOOOOO! He CHOSE instead to play the power trip most of them love so much! It is not about good and evil or even about Sex It is RELIGIOUS RAPE, it is all ABOUT POWER and nothing but. His sermon was on Paul misogynist approach so favoured in certain part of the world these days.

1Ti 2:8 I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.

1Ti 2:9 In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;

1Ti 2:10 But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.

1Ti 2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.

1Ti 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

1Ti 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

1Ti 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.

1Ti 2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

For one thing Hypatia wasn’t EVEN IN the fucking church to begin with so she wasn’t breaking church rules but she was an influence on the prefect and therefore power so Cyril made sure power was his that is how saints are made these days.

OK the details are from fictive script but the gist of history concurs. Cyril wasn’t a favourite of Carl Sagan either.

And it wasn’t the first nor certainly the last time innocent people were cruelly killed by religious fanatics more than often nothing more than psychopath pillars of society under a thin veneer of lies.

As a matter of fact if everybody would FOLLOW this: Deu 32:35 To me belongeth vengeance, and recompence;

This world would be almost paradisiacal. Let GOD take care of his own business he is big enough


Thursday, October 21, 2010


Hollywood and TV and Media “AGENDA”

If one was to say that Medias have an “agenda” these days one might think that “converting” the whole western world to atheism is high on the list.

And like all fundamentalists, they too, have their champions: Dawkins, Hitchens, Penn & Teller, only to mention a few. Also some of the most popular shows seem to have a go at god. House and Bones are great proponents of nihilism and humans as mere animals with bones and flesh and you can add to this circus the latest episode of Glee now.

All having their pet peeves and specialties, reminding me in some sort of Jehovah Witnesses, destroying the foundation of your faith usually Catholicism for many (ALSO a JW FAV) and then building on Ground Zero with their personal approach, which like all others, IS the ONLY approach that makes any sense of course.

Destroying ONE target does not make YOUR argument the only other argument available.

Easy target to destroy the Vatican and Islam and whatever else they like to toy with and then to come on with their own arrogant brilliance as if intellectualism was the solution to all.

Of course it HAS been proven many times. Insert sarcastic grin here. (or google anti-intellectualism)

You could probably also bombed the bible to pieces and laugh right in the face of God and since he doesn’t answer you of course win the so-called favourite sport of atheists: debate.

I have been dealing I suppose in my own minor intellectual way with the big questions and been wavering between all sorts of unanswered arguments about the “eternal” issues and YES we have been lied to by many religions and YES they are responsible for a lot of blood but, religious or not, mankind in general DOES have a lot of blood to answer for whether one is intellectual or not.

I still don’t have any answer but somehow I ALSO still have many big questions not spoken for or addressed at least in my heart and mind and bottom line it is all that counts really. If and if and if I was to be wrong on many issues I sure can’t tell the Great Honcho in the Sky or “somewhere” else: "Well Dawkins said so and so and he won the debate you know?"

My last rampart if I might call it so is some form of absolute uselessness and futility to our 100 years or so on this planet and some of us don’t even get 100 minutes but also a great sense of what I would call an eternal value: Justice or rather the lack of it on this planet and moreover RETRIBUTIVE JUSTICE.

Trying to fit in my little head that this pontificating pompous arrogant SOB lives a hundred years and dies peacefully in his sleep, along with the countless horrors of human beings that have passed on this planet: some now hidden among the pillars of our society. All the Stalins, and Maos, and Hitlers, and countless others passing by along with the Satanic Mills and the thousands of years of history and horrors that have come along and then compared to this cute little adorable being who was all heart but got nothing but trouble and sickness and lack of fortune and what not and died horribly and way too young. And I don’t mean the religious hypocrites but the real kind hearted ones I am sure you have met a few.

Trying to “figure” that the good and the bad all end up in the same nihilistic hole just does not compute in the great picture.

Anyway I hope you get the gist of my gestations.

I like Sagan saying that he didn’t know enough to be an atheist and that Ann Druyan is from what I heard her say an agnostic which seems to be one of Dawkins pet peeves as well.

Yahweh and Agnostics must have pissed in his cereals when he was younger.

I guess to profess anything requires more knowledge that the human mind can contain. So far the human mind hasn’t proved much of anything at all from either side the intellectual or the religious.

Both are just too proud to admit that they are ignorant and they have no real answer and this “belong in my club or else” attitude is so childish and puerile that IF there was any extra terrestrial intelligence out there they would CERTAINLY know enough to stay as far away from our intra terrestrial madness as possible.

So to repeat my further statement:

Mankind in general DOES have a lot of blood to answer for.

And since it is not answered in the here and now my question is where and when?

No need to be a psychologist to tell you what impunity leads to in this life alone if not the next.

P.S. The classic story of having my poor brother or sister dying of a horrible death so I am gonna get back at this god who didn’t answer ME and huff and puff and blow his house away is too puerile to touch really.

Yeah! Right! That will show him! Go Girl or Boy!

So called intellectual claims it seems to me are very often thinly veiled in an emotional cauldron of anger and hatred and revenge of some sort under a cool disguise a bit like the captain of the Bounty trying to look cool in court.

One can almost see the HUMONGOUS chip on one’s shoulder at times.

We are not rational beings by any shape or form! Emotions rule the world and are impossible to separate from the false rational argument.

The only answer is in DEATH!

Even stronger than TAXES trust me!

I am so glad no one can come back from it to win his/her argument.

There is a god right there in THAT wisdom. J

Friday, October 15, 2010

Give me Stalin and St Paul

Give me Stalin and St Paul
Give me Christ or give me Hiroshima

Fascinating juxtaposition.

Considering Hiroshima’s “gift” was from “one nation under God”

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

But then “they” had “their” god too ... the Emperor and blah blah blah.

So called Christianity anyway calls for much more blood that was poured at Hiroshima or on top of Hiroshima one might say.

It also calls for much more blood that Stalin shed and I understand this could be a staggering amount not counting Mao’s “Haemophilia”.

Hitler’s blood pouring and his controversy with Pius XII could almost be counted on the side of so-called Christianity too.

My insomniac musing last night brought me to ponder on the role of Paul on all this follow up madness.

Considering that Paul wrote thirteen of the twenty-seven books of the New Testament, and 31.57 percent of the text. Those numbers do not include the book of Hebrews, which some people believe he wrote. The authorship of that book is debatable. So Paul’s role is easily stretched to 50% if you include Hebrews and consider that half of Acts is about him.

Therefore Paul more than Jesus himself seems to be “responsible” for what followed.

Carl Sagan on this subject said quite a few interesting things, among them he said

What I'm saying is, if God wanted to send us a message, and ancient writings were the only way he could think of doing it, he could have done a better job.

Also he added

§ Human beings have a demonstrated talent for self-deception when their emotions are stirred.

§ For a long time the human instinct to understand was thwarted by facile religious explanations.

A celibate clergy is an especially good idea, because it tends to suppress any hereditary propensity toward fanaticism.

“An atheist has to know a lot more than I know."

Human Talent for self-deception is quite obvious on the thousand schisms a religious leader engenders. It seems we are absolute specialists at being “Schizo”. Splitting is our specialty. Divide and conquer or whatever it is we do it well. Look at the numerous sects and factions of the 3 main religious leaders: Jesus, Mohammad and Buddha, if I can call them the 3 main ones.

The study of all their factions and divisions from a very early stage after their deaths is mind boggling altogether and impossible to untangle or even understand for a single being.

But back to this blood story I don’t think Leonard Cohen was that far off the truth and outrageous. Stalin and St Paul have in many ways a lot of blood on their hands. My purpose here is not to go into the Pauline theology or Stalinian “atheology” but to point that in history both religion, and the lack or denial of it has been responsible for an awful lot of literal murders.

So that Cohen’s juxtaposition doesn’t sound so awkward all things considered.

Earthlings Limited Communication

The urban legend of 10% of our brains is almost true on a screen.

I am trying to learn about communications and Everybody is trying to sell me something!

What does that tell you?

That is the difference between Googling and the Britannica

but the Britannica already sold you something.

Listen With Your Eyes

Tips for Understanding Nonverbal Communication

Here is a more precise (and necessarily detailed) representation of Mehrabian's findings than is typically cited or applied:

7% of message pertaining to feelings and attitudes is in the words that are spoken.

38% of message pertaining to feelings and attitudes is paralinguistic (the way that the words are said).

55% of message pertaining to feelings and attitudes is in facial expression.

Total Liking = 7% Verbal Liking + 38% Vocal Liking + 55% Facial Liking

According to Mehrabian here, a lot of make or break, good and bad blood are made over basically a mean of communication that only allows for SEVEN PERCENT of what we really mean.

93% of it is LOST on a cold screen.

How many of you had a BIG argument on the screen that was solved in 5 seconds flat over a phone call? And that was only 45% still of the whole communication prism.

A lot of what I say also or write is lost due to my poor EQ, my lack of communication skills and especially writing skills AND there is a big loss also in audience awareness since I speak gibberish where the only entity that could understand me would be my guardian angelJ! One, who would have been over my shoulder all my life, lived everything I have lived, and read every line I have read.

i.e. if I say

"I have the EQ of Charlie Gordon"

which is very short I would lose almost all interest from everyone because they have no idea what I am talking about and I am too lazy to explain. Maybe a bit of googling would decipher my secret code but who wants to google everything?

Charlie Gordon is my favourite fiction character of all times. From Daniel Keyes's Flowers for Algernon he is a retard in a sci-fi novel who gets an operation to become intelligent. His starting IQ was very low. What is not mentioned as so in the novel but is thoroughly explained is that his EQ (Emotional Quotient) did not grow along with his IQ.

There is nothing wrong with googling but we all have priorities of interests and time that are totally different for each of us.

Having said all this also I forgot to mention the greatest handicap of communication altogether, first our humanness and second linguistics and semantics.

I mean we are not built for telepathy for many reasons one being our shortcomings and evilness and words are quite constraining when it comes to expressions and ideas in a nutshell.

Now after my long intro I must espand on a short written comment. J

You said it yourself and revealed that sexism when expressing that a woman has more ability to hang on by a thread for their children than does a man.. that is very stereotypical and steeped in your own socialization within a sexist patriarchal society..

I disagree with that for many reasons. For one try attacking a bear cub who knows nothing about our human imperfections and see who is coming at you with big teeth and big claws if that is a good example. It has nothing at all to do with stereotypes or any big chips on our shoulders we might have, it is a natural instinct, visceral, primal and primitive (except for the mouse who eats her own kids if she feels danger) a mother will hang on to the very end for her progeniture. After all she is the one who has suffered and given birth to them.

Dads in nature given a chance will kill the babies just so they can fuck the mother.

OK not all dads but it’s not easy being a young male animal I tell you! J

As a side note here a study of “suicide” among animals is also interesting if you neglect the lemming legends.

(I also realised here that some of my meaning might get lost in translation since my “mother tongue” is French.)

Also I who have a tendency to see only black and white tend to see grey here as in a mix with no name yet between patriarchy and matriarchy. It doesn’t HAVE to be ONE or the OTHER. I prefer a sense of French Fraternity and Liberty and EQUALITY here! J

Some sort of old Jesusian* values. J

Jesus got them together to settle things down. "You've observed how godless rulers throw their weight around," he said, "and when people get a little power how quickly it goes to their heads.

It's not going to be that way with you.

Whoever wants to be great must become a servant/waiter/errand runner.

Whoever wants to be first among you must be your slave.

* There are few words more bastardised, misnamed, misconstrued, wrongly used, murdered and butchered as the word Christian.

Voila! C’est tout pour le moment!

Tuesday, October 5, 2010




You know what I say to people when I hear they’re writing an anti-war book??

I say, "Why don’t you write an anti-glacier book instead?"

What he meant, of course, was that there would always be wars, that they were as easy to stop as glaciers. I believe that, too.

Kurt Vonnegut

Imagine No Religion!?!?!?!??

I can tell you one thing that is much more REALISTIC to imagine.

Imagine No Dawkins! Just give it 10 or 20 years at most.

Imagine no John Lennon! That is done already.

Imagination is good if you write a FICTION but if you try to change the immovable and unchangeable you might as well try to push back the Empire State Building with your shoulder power.

It reminds me of this old silly story about two patients out of the mental ward walking by the Empire State Building and saying it’s a really nice place but there’s something though, it’s too close to the street. Let’s push it back a little. So they lean against it and push and push and since it is a really hot day they take their coat off and shove ‘em on the sidewalk. As they are pushing someone passes by and steals their coats. One of the patients still pushing turns around and screams to his partner: STOP! STOP! STOP! We pushed far enough we can’t see our coats anymore.

Religion and War will never disappear in a million years if this planet lasts as long as there are 2 human beings left on it. And there is no so called intellect or so called reason that is going to change that ever.

Wars and Religions are stupid and evil and wrong and murderous and bloody and so much more but what else do you expect from monkeys with guns or sticks if they keep going?

Lord of the Flies or no Lord of the Flies, bottom line is people are basically, intrinsically, innately stupid and evil period. No need to be scientists to know that given the chance to start all over mankind would fuck it up all over again.

Go ahead wipe the planet and try my theory and see! J

I only bet when I am sure to win!